AN AGENTIC PLATFORM FOR INDUSTRIAL SECURITY
Model your industrial assets, networks and security boundaries. Explore potential attack paths, compare proposed changes and focus validation on the questions that matter to your operation.
01 / REPRESENT
Connect production equipment, PLCs, operator systems and industrial networks in a common model. See the dependencies that individual asset lists miss, and give security and OT teams a shared understanding of what the operation relies on.
The cutaway connects physical equipment with its role in production, control and operational oversight.
02 / EXPLORE
Follow a potential route through the model and examine the processes and devices it could affect. Agentic analysis helps focus the questions worth investigating, turning connectivity into a more purposeful discussion of industrial risk.
Amber highlights a modeled route. A hypothesis and an observed test result carry different weight.
03 / COMPARE
Place the baseline beside a proposed security boundary. See which relationships change, examine the trade-offs and build a focused case for validation. The executable-twin vision extends this into authorised attack-and-defence exercises inside an isolated replica.
Compare the modeled baseline and proposed boundary to frame a focused engineering review.
04 / APPLY
Focus on production, control or operations to see how a concern fits the wider facility. Bring asset context, proposed improvements and supporting findings to the people who decide—linking resilience planning with the evidence conversation in Raqib Compliance.
Select a floor to connect the industrial role with the questions and improvements your team should consider.
Review controller relationships and communication boundaries in the modeled environment.
See it in the platformFROM THE MODEL TO THE PLATFORM
Explore selected details from Raqib Digital Twin: assets, exposure, boundaries, scenarios and agentic recommendations.
THE DIGITAL TWIN VISION
An industrial model gives teams a shared picture. The executable-twin direction takes the next step: scoped validation in an isolated replica, with findings tied to what was actually tested.
Use the digital representation to explore dependencies, potential exposure and proposed changes.
The executable-twin design brings attack and defence agents into authorised exercises, with findings qualified by the depth of the replica.
Planned capability: rehearse recovery in the twin and examine what it takes to restore operations. Availability and scope are discussed in a private demonstration.
Selected interface details with identifiers masked. All figures and assets are fictional, not customer results.
01 / Connected representation
Bring assets, industrial zones and communication relationships into one model. Give engineering and security a common reference for the environment they need to protect.
One facility context for engineering and security
02 / Industrial visibility
Locate PLCs, operator stations, historians and sensors within their industrial zones. Understand the role of each device and the connections that make it relevant to operations.
Asset visibility with industrial meaning
03 / Modeled exposure
Explore potential routes through the model and the systems they could reach. Use those hypotheses to scope investigation; observed validation is needed to establish a tested finding.
From modeled possibility to a focused validation question
04 / Segmentation perspective
Compare expected separation with modeled connectivity. Identify boundaries and dependencies that need engineering review before evaluating a change in a controlled environment.
Security boundaries, viewed through operational dependencies
05 / What-if planning
Compare a proposed security boundary with the baseline model. See which relationships change and discuss the implications before planning validation or considering a production change.
Compare alternatives. Understand the trade-offs.
06 / Agentic recommendations
Review proposed improvements alongside the modeled exposure that prompted them. Security and OT teams evaluate the options, set priorities and authorize the next step.
Recommendations with context. Decisions with accountability.Understand assets, boundaries and operational dependencies together.
Use modeled scenarios to frame focused questions for controlled validation.
Connect proposed improvements to the context and findings behind them.
A DIGITAL TWIN DEMONSTRATION
Use a fictional facility to compare a baseline with a proposed segmentation change. Examine the modeled implications and decide what would need validation.
Explore scenario planningIdentify the industrial zones, device roles and connections involved.
Examine modeled connectivity before and after the proposed boundary.
Review assumptions and dependencies with your security and engineering teams.
Raqib Digital Twin
Bring your next audit, an unresolved exposure or a proposed operational change. We’ll help you explore the relevant Raqib platform and define a focused next step for your team.
Start a conversationABOUT THE PLATFORMS
Raqib Compliance Platform connects compliance requirements, evidence and readiness. Raqib Digital Twin brings a digital representation of industrial context to the exploration of potential threats and resilience scenarios. They support complementary decisions about protecting critical operations.
Organizations responsible for critical industrial operations, including oil and gas, energy and utilities, and manufacturing. A private discussion helps establish the right fit for your environment and priorities.
AI-powered agents support the analysis of compliance and industrial resilience. The aim is clearer context, more focused attention and better-informed decisions, with people responsible for direction and judgment.
We begin with your organization’s context and objectives, then discuss the relevant platform and next steps. Detailed capabilities, scope, and availability are addressed directly with the SABIGH team.